Pros: Good quality printer capable of printing to 13×19 sheets. Some users seemed to retain a grinding sound within the printer causing hardware failures. Canon print head is subject to burning out. Delivers quality prints when paired with Dmax.Ĭons: Discontinued by Canon. Delivers quality prints when paired with Dmax in the black tank using MONO or all tanks using ABI.Ĭons: Common media sensor issue requiring either a strip of low tac tape to be run down the center of the backside of the film or the use of a paper carrier sheet. we're so digitally dominated, we sometimes forget these things.Pros: Good quality Ecotank printer capable of printing to 13×19 sheets. etc.) - and the RX100 is basically a go-anywhere camera.īeyond that, I was simply encouraging people to plug in the old printer and see how incredible images can look in analogue. I have prints from bigger (older) clunkier cameras, and they don't look as good as these (they're less detailed, there is more fringing, etc. to the point that I even wonder if I should be using my NEX7 or a900 much at all (except where very shallow DOF is desired). My point was that the visual impact of prints is greater than what you see on the screen-which is how most of us view photos these days-and that the humble RX100 creates images that look spectacular in print. It was not about the printer (I have an old mid-range Pixma) nor the paper (I only mentioned the paper to say that it helps to use good paper). Various Standards, which list is correct for Photo Printing sizes? (I am used to Architectural Sizes, in inches)ītw, There are no common print paper sizes/names anywhere on this chart, 3x5, 4圆, 5x7, 8x10. Sad I cannot use replacement ink, as I have with other printers successfully in the past, oh well. I have a color chart, 21 colors on the edge of the paper, so you can take a picture of it, print it, and compare original, monitor, print colors edge to edge, and, I test the printer directly by making a copy.Īnd, in the past, I found that different software affected the print outcome, with no other changes. Printing close ups of Hydrangeas with varied blues and purples in one plant/bud tells you a lot. I printed several things recently, found out how my Epson Printer beautifully matched screen and actual colors using OEM ink and Canon Premium glossy Paper. The printer and software need to be confirmed/adjusted before judging the results. It will print 11x17, have not tried that yet. I get very nice prints, 8.5 x 11 size, from my Epson WF-7510, multi-function machine, 4 standard ink jet colors, from any nice original, rx100 included of course. Is it not true that any nice original with enough pixels for the chosen print size should look good if the printer is adjusted correctly? Question is whether I have the guts to try it at home. Things might be different with the Pixma. I actually bought some aluminium foil sheets for printing a few years back but it didn't work on my old Epson printer. I have about 20 or so up to24"x36" but not from RX100. You want a mind-blowing print experience? Have one printed on Aluminum!!! It's an eye-opening, mind-opening experience. If you haven't done so already, I urge you to try this for yourself. I have them sitting on a shelf and can't stop looking at them. Sure, you have better DOF control with a full-frame or APS-C camera, and that will be noticeable in the image, but the print images from the RX100 are stunning in their own right. I printed on Canon's premium quality 'Platinum' Glossy paper.Īll I can say is WOW! I obviously don't have any controlled comparisons to make with my other cameras, but looking at these simple 'home prints', I find it hard to imagine that the images could be much better (at this size at least). I used my obsolete mid-range Canon Pixma printer and printed at A4 size. Yesterday, I decided to print some RX100 shots for my girlfriend as gifts for her and her family. In the past, I've printed some a700 and a900 shots and have been pleasantly surprised about how good they looked compared to what I used to get out of my earlier digital and film cameras. Most of them sit on my harddrive and some are shared in much reduced versions with friends and in the forums here. Like most of us, I expect, I don't print a lot of my photos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |